Federal government’s ninth execution of the year raises questions

The Federal government’s ninth execution of the year, and the first federal execution in a lame-duck period in 130 years begs the question, Why?

Brandon Bernard’s execution on Dec. 10 marks the first execution during a presidential “lame-duck” period in 130 years. The execution was the first in a series of five executions scheduled before the transition of power on Jan. 20. If all five executions take place, President Trump will be the most prolific executioner ever with 13 federal executions in one year.

Alfred Zappala, an attorney and Lawrence native, said this, “The timing of this series of executions is purely coincidental. With just three federal executions between 1988 and 2019, Trump is only doing what he thinks is right, and that is upholding the sentence of the death penalty and executing the prisoners.”

Kathleen Holmes, a professor of Sociology at NECC, shared her expert opinion: “We are lucky that the lame duck period is much shorter now than it once was. The 20th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution established January 20 as Inauguration Day, moving it back from March 4. Many out-going presidents act in the interest of the country in the last days (the lame duck session) of their term. Reagan signed a nuclear disarmament treaty, Clinton balanced the budget, Dubya made some moves around the recession and Obama created a Pan-Asian trade agreement. However, today’s outgoing president is, let us just say, ‘different’ than the presidents most living Americans remember. His actions in his lame-duck session do not reflect an interest in the country’s future but instead seemingly reflect personal interest. He is pushing through five federal executions before January 20, 2021.

“There is no sociological theory that can explain the behavior. The death penalty, from a functionalist view, provides social cohesion on issues of ‘right vs wrong’ and establishes the rule of the government among other effects. From the conflict theorist’s view, the lame-duck period is an opportunity for outgoing politicians to create a legacy that maintains power for one group, while denying other groups access to power. The death penalty is the ultimate power held by a government and is most certainly a tool of oppression . This year-2020 — it has also been manipulated; executions took place during the height of social unrest — but they were ALL white. Now, three out of the four to be executed are black; the one woman is white, and she will be the first woman executed by the federal government since 1953.If all scheduled executions are carried out, the federal government will have executed more people than all states combined in 2020. Quite the legacy.”

Meredith Gunning, a professor of Philosophy and Ethics at NECC, said this: “During his lame duck period, I see President Trump using federal executions as a political ploy to make himself look like a law-and-order president. Some of this is political posturing but it comes at the cost of human lives. On the other hand, it is also well known that Trump himself is a strong advocate of capital punishment. This is ironic given that Trump claims to be a pro-life president. A pro-life position should not just apply to lives growing in a womb. Normally a lame duck President does not carry out any federal executions in deference to the incoming President. It could be argued that Trump is using this period to flout incumbent President Biden, given that the Democratic leader has publicized that he plans on working to advance the abolition of the death penalty. The details of the cases of some of the death row inmates slated to be executed should also raise alarm bells. Take Brandon Bernard, for instance, who was only 18 when he committed his crimes. Granted a young white married couple died because of his actions. But by all accounts, he was a truly changed person who was remorseful for the loss of life his actions inflicted. The warden along with many others, including five jurors in his original trial begged in vain for his life to be spared since he was a model prisoner who helped mentor young prisoners. He was doing more good alive than dead. Four black men are scheduled for executions. Given the prevalent problems of systemic racism in the American justice system, this ought to raise public outcry. One of those black men, Alfred Bourgeois, brutally murdered his two year old which is bound to get many riled up, wanting retribution. But evidence has surfaced that Bourgeois had an intellectual disability that was never presented to a court. This fact alone ought to show that he should no thave borne the most severe of penalties given his diminished rational capacities.

“Some of the other people being executed, including Lisa Montgomery, have records of mental illness which also ought to be considered as mitigating factors. Last but not least, why rush to have a number of Federal executions during a Pandemic? Is there not enough death already?”

 

Happiest Season: A thoughtful comedy about family and holidays

Going home to see your family for the holidays is stressful. Of course, you love them and you’re happy to see them, but let’s be honest here. It’s stressful!

It’s even more stressful when you’re secretly gay and bringing your lesbian lover home but no one in your family knows you’re a lesbian so you have to pretend that you’re just roommates. That’s the premise of the new Hulu Original Christmas movie, Happiest Season. Directed by Clea DuVall, the movie stars Kristen Stewart and Mackenzie Davis and features an amazing supporting cast consisting of Victor Garber, Mary Steenburgen, Alison Brie, Dan Levy, and Aubrey Plaza, plus many others.

The film follows Abby (Stewart) and Harper (Davis) when they go to Harper’s childhood home for Christmas. Harper’s family doesn’t know she’s gay, which Abby isn’t aware of until the two have already almost reached the house.

Now, for five days, she’s forced to pretend to be Harper’s platonic roommate around Harper’s family. Harper’s father is running for city mayor and wants his family to look perfect and avoid any potential scandals. Harper’s mother is obsessed with projecting the image of the perfect family on Instagram. One of Harper’s sister is overly hyper and kind of odd, and her other sister is emotionally repressed and has two kids who seem miserable.

One of the things I like about this movie is the fact that there’s no antagonist. There are no characters looking to cause problems or make trouble. The antagonist is, in a way, life itself.

From the moment we’re introduced to Harper’s family, we immediately see why she hasn’t felt comfortable coming out. Her family is obsessed with projecting a certain type of picture-perfect conservative image, and Harper hasn’t felt like being a lesbian fits into that image. No one in the family seems like a bad person, rather, they just seem like they have shallow priorities.

This is my favorite role I’ve seen Kristen Stewart in for quite a few years. It’s easy to look at her and remember how robotic she felt in movies like the Twilight movies and Snow White and the Huntsman, but I have to give her credit for doing a great job in this movie. She’s not overly emotional but she does succeed in conveying Abby’s complex emotional state.

Harper is a little harder to like. At first, you want to feel bad for her. Coming out to your family is so difficult to do and she clearly doesn’t feel like she can do it. But the way she essentially traps Abby into living this lie is pretty sleazy. She waits until they’re already on their way to the house to drop the bomb on Abby.

Then there’s Harper’s behavior while she’s home and reunited with old friends and exes. I won’t spoil it but she comes across as selfish. It makes you wonder why Abby is with her.

The side characters outside of Abby and the family are all bringing something to the table, and no one feels superfluous. We get to meet Harper’s ex-boyfriend, an ex-girlfriend, and some colleagues of Harper’s father. Dan Levy also co-stars as Abby’s friend and confidant. At first, he comes across as the type of annoying guy who’s “too woke” and takes a stand against absolutely everything. As the movie progresses though, he becomes more likable and shows that he’s actually a deep person.

Just about every character gets a moment to shine. While it’s easy to look at some characters as being stereotypes or tropes, once you get to know these people, you realize they’re much more complicated than that.

Something else I enjoy about this movie is how universal it feels. Whether you’re a member of the LGBTQ+ community or not, you can relate to the idea of trying to live up to your family’s expectations.

When you’re an adult returning home, there’s an odd contrast between being an adult with a job, a home, maybe a family of your own, but also being a kid around your parents. No matter how old you are, your parents will always look at you the way they did when you’re a kid. It’s just part of being a parent.

And we can all understand the desire to please our parents and make them proud of us. And if you have siblings, it’s natural to compare yourself to them. Who’s wealthier? Who’s married and who’s single? Who has the better career? There’s a type of competition that happens between adult siblings whether you’re conscious of it or not.

Happiest Season is a very well-written movie. It’s got comedy, it’s got drama, it’s got holiday cheer. The cast is wonderful and their characters are three-dimensional and well-written.

Even though it’s a movie centered around LGBTQ+ characters, I wouldn’t classify it as an LGBTQ+ movie. The movie is about family dynamics and just happens to prominently feature some lesbians. I highly recommend checking this one out!

 

 

Tutoring center helps students reach their goals

College students, specifically the ones at NECC and first time students, have had their struggles integrating into college life as of late.

With this pandemic and getting used to the new virtual learning, many students have had difficulties adjusting to a new learning experience that they still haven’t been accustomed to.

The changes in classes and subjects might be a benefit to some, but others still need all the help they can get to achieve a good grade and be more up to date with topics.

That is why Jennifer Levesque, a Coordinator of Tutoring, is here at NECC.

Tutoring has been growing as of late, and is an efficient style of helping students improving theirgrades in certain classes.

“The main goal is to help students with their classes and to help them understand certain concepts and skills, so they can grasp the material,” Levesque says.

Levesque helps out and tutors students who are in need of help with certain subjects, and with this long-lasting pandemic, her schedule has been filling up at a heavy rate this year.

“Tutoring gives students skills so they can succeed in their classes. We also encourage students to be more independent thinkers so that they can be successful college students.”

Adjusting to college learning compared to high school can be a challenge as Levesque claims, so the encouragement to think in certain ways is what Levesque as well as many tutors attempt to do when helping out their students.

Students tend to have difficulties with a lot of subjects, but the most difficult ones?

“It really depends on the student, but there are a lot of students who struggle with math and writing,” Levesque said.

Along with math and writing, NECC also provides tutoring in different subjects such as ESL, science, social students, and computer science.

“To make an appointment with a tutor go to Navigate by logging into the app (search forNavigate Student in the Google Play or Apple App Store) and clicking on “Appointments” or log into Navigate on a computer by signing into myNECC and clicking on “Navigate Student” and select “Virtual Appointment” as the location.”

Noelle: A different type of Christmas movie

I’m the first to admit that I’m a bit of a grinch when it comes to Christmas movies. I feel like they all follow the same formula and if you’ve seen one, you’ve seen a thousand. When a friend told me to watch Noelle on Disney Plus, I immediately rolled my eyes. Then I heard it starred Anna Kendrick as the titular character and Bill Hader as her older brother so I was in. I’m so glad I gave this movie a shot because I ended up absolutely loving it.

The first thing you need to know about Noelle is that in the movie’s universe, Santa isn’t a person, but a title. Members of the Kringle family take on the title of Santa as if it’s North Pole royalty. After the current Santa dies, his son, Nick, is forced to take on the role but Nick isn’t ready. His younger sister, Noelle, has a much deeper passion for Christmas than he does but because she’s a woman, she’s not considered for the job, which is just fine with her. She’s perfectly happy making glittery Christmas cards and being a glorified cheerleader. When Nick panics over the looming Christmas, Noelle tells him he should take a weekend off and relax and when he does, he disappears completely. Noelle figures out he went to Phoenix, Arizona and follows him accompanied by her longtime nanny and caretaker, Elf Polly.

In Phoenix, Noelle hires a private detective, Jake, who’s able to locate Nick at a yoga studio, where he’s more comfortable working than being the new Santa. Then you have your typical shenanigans where Noelle tries to convince Nick to come back, reveals who she is to Jake, gets in some trouble with the locals until Jake realizes she was telling the truth and helps her get back home with Nick in tow.

Back at the North Pole, Nick apologizes to everyone for leaving and says he’s not meant to be Santa, but Noelle is. There’s this weird council of elves that say she can’t because she’s female but one elf says he just happened to check the rules and nothing says a woman can’t be the new Santa. Noelle becomes the new Santa, unsure of herself at first until she visits a homeless shelter she came across in Phoenix and everyone calls her Santa, giving her confidence and she finishes up the night without any problems.

While parts of the film feel pretty formulaic, Noelle offers just enough fresh ideas that this movie isn’t completely predictable. At the beginning of the movie, Noelle is a naïve, somewhat spoiled person. She loves Christmas for the superficial aspects like presents and carols and fun decorations. When she’s in Phoenix, outside of her isolated bubble of the North Pole, she meets people with real problems, like Jake and the people at the homeless shelter. While there’s an ongoing joke that everyone wants an iPad, Noelle meets people like a deaf child who wants her mother to be able to find a job. When she sees that there are people who want selfless, intangible things rather than just toys, she starts to understand the real meaning of Christmas, which she explains once she returns to the North Pole.

Christmas shouldn’t be about getting the most expensive stuff or getting the most toys. Christmas can’t even solve people’s problems. That’s not what it’s about. It’s about showing other people you care and having hope that things can get better. It’s about enjoying being together and being grateful for what you do have and the people you have. I love that Noelle actually grows as a person and learns what the holiday should really be about, that it’s more than just presents and pretty lights and decorations. Too many people get hung up on the shallow aspects of the holiday so it’s nice to see a character start that way and go through genuine development to see what really matters.

Jake is the other major protagonist of the movie. He’s recently divorced and has a son, Alex. All Alex wants for Christmas is for his entire family to be together even though his mother is remarried. Jake wants his son to be happy but is worried that if he spends Christmas with his ex-wife and her new husband, it will be awkward and uncomfortable, which will end up making it a miserable holiday for Alex. Alex, being a kid, doesn’t understand this kind of complicated dynamic. He just wants to be with his family, which is very sweet. And while he does help Noelle, he’s not filling any type of white knight or Prince Charming trope. He’s just a good guy trying to earn a living and take care of his son. I also appreciate that the movie doesn’t try to couple him up with Noelle. It would have been too easy to have them fall for each other and live happily ever after in the North Pole. I really enjoy that these two likeable and attractive characters of the opposite sex come together, form a friendship, and it doesn’t go further than that. It’s kind of refreshing to see two characters connect in a meaningful but platonic way because normally it turns into falling in love or one falls in love with the other.

There are some additional side characters who are fun. Bill Hader is enjoyable as Nick but his usual level of zany intensity is definitely toned down in this movie. He basically exists to be motivation for Noelle. Elf Polly is the wise and somewhat stern guardian figure for Noelle who gives her advice but lets her make her own decisions. There’s also another character, Gabriel, who is Noelle’s cousin and gets tasked with being the new Santa when Nick vanishes. Gabriel is a tech genius who tries to come up with formulas and calculations to see which children in the world are good enough to earn presents. According to Gabriel’s strict calculations, only about twenty-eight hundred kids are good enough to receive presents this year while all the others get a text message explaining what they need to improve upon for next year. It’s so outlandish and ridiculous that you can’t help but find it cute. Other actors could have definitely made Gabriel come across as a villain but Billy Eichner portrays him in a way that’s not malicious, just out of touch and lacking certain social graces.

Noelle is admittedly a bit predictable. I don’t think anyone watching it becomes surprised when she’s made the new Santa. But thanks to a talented cast and a meaningful message, the movie has enough heart and charm to be worth watching, even for a grinch like me.

 

 

Apple’s newest headphones cost about half my rent

Apple has yet again stirred up the internet’s opinions with another piece of tech; the AirPods Max. With one last attempt to get some sales before the Holiday season ends, Apple’s newest headphones are having people raise a lot of questions, but not enough wallets.

If there’s one thing that Apple is good at, is getting us to talk about them. This Tuesday, Apple unveiled their very, very expensive over-the-ear headphones. Apple described their newest product as “the magic of AirPods in a stunning over-ear design,” and based off of the internet’s opinions, they may not be stunning enough.

Apple’s AirPods Max are priced at a heavy $549, which is almost double the price of some of the best over-the-ear headphones that money can buy, and just about the same price as Sony’s PS5. For those struggling to purchase the PS5, this might be a good alternative… kind of? At least you can show off to your friends.

To put things into perspective, here are some things that cost just about the same price as Apple’s newest headphones: A round trip to Paris, a PS5, 3 months of Car Insurance, 33 weeks’ worth of gas in my car (trust me, I did the math.) Safe to say that there are better investments you can make.

These new wireless headphones combine a number of classic AirPods functionalities with a new over-the-ear design.

Key features include Adaptive EQ, Active Noise Cancelling, Transparency mode, and other things that other headphones have already had available, for a very long time (Sony’s X100 line headphones for example.)

There is one thing that might be useful after all though, as the new headphones have a 20-hour battery life. If Apple’s claims are true, that should be just enough battery life to get you through your pandemically stress induced days, with some good tunes.

Apple’s all new AirPods Max are available to preorder from Apple’s website for $549, and was scheduled to be officially released on Dec. 15.