With the 2024 presidential election less than a year away, it is important to look at the differences between the Trump Administration and the Biden Administration. The contrasting approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations in key policy areas, such as the economy, abortion rights, health care, climate change, immigration, and foreign policy, reflect a profound ideological shift in U.S. governance.
In a recent poll of 100 students at NECC, the difference between a vote for Trump and a vote for Biden is only 2% in Bidens favor.The overwhelming number of students are still undecided. The issues that matter most to students may be the difference between a Trump win or a Biden win in November of 2024.
Economy
Trump Administration: Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. economy was steered by policies that emphasized deregulation and substantial tax cuts, primarily benefiting corporations and the wealthy. Trump’s economic agenda was grounded in stimulating growth through these measures, coupled with a protectionist trade stance. This approach included renegotiating trade deals and imposing tariffs to safeguard domestic industries, which sometimes led to global trade tensions. However, this strategy also faced challenges like a growing national debt and economic uncertainties.
Biden Administration: President Joe Biden’s economic policy, dubbed ‘Bidenomics’, represents a significant departure from his predecessor’s approach. It focuses on addressing the COVID-19 pandemic’s economic impacts through stimulus measures and large-scale infrastructure investments. These initiatives are funded by proposed tax increases on wealthier individuals and corporations, aiming to redistribute wealth and strengthen social safety nets. The Biden administration has overseen considerable job creation, rebounding from the pandemic-induced downturn and indicating a shift towards economic recovery and sustainability.
Abortion Rights
Trump Administration: Trump’s presidency marked a clear pro-life stance, demonstrated by policies like reinstating the Global Gag Rule and appointing conservative justices to the Supreme Court. These actions signaled a potential threat to abortion rights in the U.S. and were a pivot towards more restrictive reproductive health policies.
Biden Administration: In contrast, Biden’s administration has maintained a pro-choice perspective, advocating for reproductive autonomy and supporting women’s rights to access comprehensive health care, including abortion services. This stance aligns with broader efforts to ensure women’s reproductive rights are protected and accessible.
Health Care
Trump Administration: The Trump administration’s hallmark health care policy was its persistent effort to dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This approach aimed at replacing the ACA with an alternative that potentially reduced coverage and protections, leading to widespread concerns about healthcare accessibility.
Biden Administration: Biden’s health care strategy sharply contrasts with Trump’s, focusing on expanding health care access and affordability. His administration has enhanced ACA subsidies, proposed a public option to compete with private insurers, and sought to lower the Medicare eligibility age. These policies aim to extend health care coverage to more Americans and address critical issues like high prescription drug costs.
Climate Change
Trump Administration: Climate change policy under Trump was characterized by skepticism and a departure from global environmental initiatives, most notably the withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement. His administration also rolled back numerous environmental protections, prioritizing economic interests over environmental sustainability.
Biden Administration: Biden’s administration has adopted a proactive stance on climate change, setting ambitious emission reduction targets and enacting significant legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act to promote clean energy and sustainability. This policy shift signifies a renewed commitment to tackling global climate challenges and fostering environmental stewardship.
Immigration
Trump Administration: Trump’s immigration policies were marked by strict enforcement and hardline measures, including the “zero tolerance” policy that led to family separations and the pursuit of a border wall. These policies, aimed at reducing illegal immigration, were criticized for their humanitarian consequences.
Biden Administration: Biden has adopted a more humanitarian approach to immigration, rescinding many of Trump’s policies and proposing measures to address the root causes of migration. His administration’s efforts include increasing asylum officer numbers and enhancing resources for border security and immigration processing, indicating a more balanced and comprehensive immigration strategy.
Foreign Policy
Trump Administration: Trump’s “America First” foreign policy favored unilateralism and national interests, leading to the U.S. withdrawing from several international agreements and often strained relations with allies. This approach emphasized bilateral over multilateral engagements and marked a significant shift in the U.S.’s global engagement strategy.
Biden Administration: In a stark contrast, Biden’s foreign policy has focused on multilateralism and rebuilding alliances. His administration has re-engaged with international organizations and agreements, emphasizing collective action in addressing global challenges. This approach aims to restore the U.S.’s position as a collaborative and reliable global player.
The Trump and Biden administrations’ divergent policies across these key areas underscore a shift from conservative to liberal ideologies. Under Trump, the focus was on economic growth through deregulation and national interests, sometimes at the expense of environmental and human rights concerns. In contrast, Biden’s policies reflect a commitment to inclusivity, environmental sustainability, and international cooperation, encapsulating the dynamic shifts in U.S. political and policy orientations.
There is a stark difference between President Biden and Donald Trump and the way they have handle the issues. Hopefully in November 2024 voters will be informed where each candidate stands on the issues that matter most to them.
In a potential second term, the twice impeached, 4 times indicted, sexual abusing fraud of a former President Donald Trump and his associates reportedly plan to use the federal government to target high-profile critics if he secures a second term.
Trump wants the Department of Justice to investigate individuals who criticized his first administration, including former Chief of Staff John Kelly, former attorney General Bill Barr, former White House council Ty Cobb, and former Chief of Joint Staff General Mark Milley. Additionally, Trump’s allies are considering using the Insurrection Act and bypassing policies to block criminal prosecutions. These plans, known as “Project 2025,” have raised concerns about the implications of using the government for political vengeance.
The ongoing threat to American democracy and the rule of law is posed by a plan to seize power and dismantle democratic institutions. This plan includes targeting political opponents and critics, taking control of the Justice Department, and deploying the military against demonstrations. It highlights the continued support for this plan from Trump’s base, Republican leadership, lawyers, and policy professionals, despite Trump’s criminal behavior and rejection of democratic principles. The text of project 2025 emphasizes the urgency of the situation and the need for voters to decide the future of American democracy in the upcoming elections.
Project 2025 is a controversial initiative that has sparked widespread concern due to its potential erosion of democratic norms. The plans to use the federal government to target high-profile critics and individuals who criticized the Trump administration have raised serious questions about the abuse of power and the independence of the Justice Department. Moreover, the consideration of using the Insurrection Act and bypassing policies to block criminal prosecutions has further fueled fears about the implications of political vengeance within the government.
Project 2025, led by the Heritage Foundation, has unveiled a manifesto titled “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise,” which espouses highly conservative and anti-LGBTQ+ views. The manifesto advocates for stringent measures against LGBTQ+ issues and individuals, including criminal penalties for pornography, outlawing pornography, and rescinding regulations prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While the extreme implications of the manifesto may not be immediately enforceable, its influence could potentially shape the policies of a future Republican administration if elected, impacting the LGBTQ+ community significantly.
Under Project 2025, if a media outlet has any negative news about the disgraced ex-president, Trump will have them investigated and will do what he can to shut it down. This mirrors what Dictator presidents like Vladimir Putin does in Russia, Kim Jung Un in North Korea, and Xi Jinping does in China, illuminating any public source that does not follow Trumps authoritarian agenda.
In addition to targeting inividuals who criticized the Trump administration, Project 2025 also includes plans to investigate media outlets that are not aligned with Trump and to investigate and jail President Biden just because Trump is under investigation and Trump hates that Joe Biden has come out squeaky clean so far from the Republicans investigation. These alarming intentions have alarmed many observers, who argue that such actions would resemble a “banana republic” and go against the principles of a free press and the peaceful transition of power, which are fundamental to a functioning democracy.
Under Project 2025, if a media outlet has any negative news about the disgraced ex-president, Trump will have them investigated and will do what he can to shut it down. This mirrors what Dictator presidents like Vladimir Putin does in Russia, Kim Jung Un in North Korea, and Xi Jinping does in China, illuminating any public source that does not follow Trumps authoritarian agenda.
The potential use of Project 2025 to arrest people who Trump believes wronged him, such as General Mark Milley, John Kelly, Bill Barr, and others, has raised serious concerns about the abuse of presidential power and the erosion of democratic norms. The notion of using the federal government to settle personal scores and target political opponents has been widely criticized for its authoritarian undertones and potential damage to the institutions of democracy.
Furthermore, the plan to investigate and jail President Biden represents a direct threat to the peaceful transfer of power and the functioning of American democracy. Such actions would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the democratic principles that form the foundation of the United States’ political system. The use of government institutions to pursue personal vendettas and undermine political opponents is antithetical to the values of democracy and the rule of law, which we know MAGA republicans really do not believe in democracy or the rule of law.
The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. The fate of American democracy hangs in the balance, and the upcoming elections will play a crucial role in determining its future. The need for voters to decisively reject the erosion of democratic norms and the abuse of power cannot be overstated. The potential consequences of allowing Project 2025 to proceed unchecked are dire, and it is essential for the American public to stand up in defense of democratic values and the rule of law.
The widespread concern and condemnation of Project 2025 reflect a deep-seated commitment to upholding democratic values and safeguarding the rights of all individuals. The initiative’s potential to erode democratic norms and target political opponents has sparked intense debate and ideological divisions within American politics.
It is imperative for the American people to remain vigilant and actively defend the principles that form the bedrock of a free and democratic society. The stakes are high, and the outcome of this ongoing struggle will have far-reaching implications for the future of American democracy.
Wait there’s more. The proposed job classification known as Schedule F aimed to increase the President’s control over the federal career civil service. However, it was widely criticized for potentially politicizing the bureaucracy and was ultimately repealed. The repeal of Schedule F underscores the importance of upholding democratic values and preserving the independence of government institutions. The initiative faced strong opposition due to concerns about its potential to undermine the merit-based civil service system and introduce partisan influence into the federal workforce.
The controversial aspects of Project 2025, including its potential erosion of democratic norms and its use of government institutions to target political opponents, have raised serious concerns about the future of American democracy. The initiative’s stance on climate policy and its potential impact on future generations, combined with its transphobic and anti-LGBTQ+ aspects, have further fueled the intense debate surrounding its implications. The repeal of Schedule F serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding democratic values and safeguarding the rights of all individuals in the face of challenges to the institutions that underpin the United States’ democratic system. It is essential for the American public to remain vigilant and actively defend the principles of democracy, as the outcome of this ongoing struggle will have profound implications for the future of the nation.
In recent months, James Comer, a Kentucky Republican representative and Chairman of the Oversite Committee, has been vocal in his accusations of corruption against President Joe Biden. Comer repeatedly highlighted a $200,000 personal loan that Biden gave to his brother, James Biden, as evidence of shady business practices within the Biden family.
However, a deeper investigation reveals a stunning display of hypocrisy on Comer’s part.Reports have uncovered that Comer himself had made a similar $200,000 loan to his own brother, raising questions about his own questionable financial dealings.
James Comer has consistently accused President Joe Biden of corruption, alleging that Biden profited from illicit international business dealings. Comer specifically homed in on two personal loan repayments made by James Biden to his brother, totaling $240,000. These transactions occurred in 2017 and 2018, when Joe Biden was neither in office nor a candidate for presidency. Despite the lack of evidence linking these loans to any nefarious activities, Comer has relentlessly attempted to paint them as proof of the president’s unethical conduct.
While James Comer has been quick to condemn Joe Biden for the loans to his brother, it has come to light that Comer himself engaged in similar financial transactions with his own brother. A closer examination of Kentucky property records reveals a series of land swaps between Comer and his brother related to their family farming business. These exchanges involved a loan of $200,000, highlighting the glaring hypocrisy of Comer’s accusations against Biden.
According to the Daily Beast, Comer and his brother were involved in land swaps and questionable business practices. In one instance, Chad Comer bought out James Comer’s half of an inherited Kentucky property for $100,000. However, just five months later, James and his wife, Tamara “TJ” Comer, purchased the property back from Chad for $218,000. This buyout resulted in Chad Comer receiving an unexplained additional $18,000 above the property’s total value.
In another transaction, James Comer gifted his brother his share of two inherited pieces of land, with a value of $175,000. Astonishingly, the cost of this transaction was only $1. Subsequently, Chad Comer applied for a significant tax break on the gifted land and then gifted James Comer a more valuable piece of land in return. These convoluted exchanges raise serious questions about the ethical nature of Comer’s financial dealings.
James Comer’s hypocrisy becomes even more apparent when considering his political positions and conflicts of interest. Prior to his election to Congress in 2016, Comer served as a member of Kentucky’s state legislature Agriculture Committee for eight years. He then went on to become the Kentucky agriculture commissioner. Once in Congress, Comer was a member of the House Agriculture Committee and even negotiated the Farm Bill, which increased federal support for American farmers.
During this time, Comer was actively engaged in the agricultural industry, while also managing his family farming business. The overlap between his political roles and his private business raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and whether he used his positions to benefit his own financial endeavors. It is evident that Comer’s actions contradict the principles he claims to uphold.
Scrutiny of James Comer’s business activities reveals a series of puzzling discrepancies. The Daily Beast discovered that Comer allegedly runs multiple businesses that do not appear to exist on paper. For instance, the company he co-owned with his father and brother, Comer Land & Cattle, has no business filings under that name in Kentucky. Similarly, his personal agriculture company, James Comer Jr. Farms, cannot be found in official records.
Notably, when Comer purchased land from his brother, the transaction involved a shell company named Farm Team Properties, LLC, owned by Comer and his wife. The existence of these mysterious entities and the lack of official documentation raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of Comer’s business practices.
Given the revelations surrounding James Comer’s own financial dealings, his accusations against Joe Biden appear hollow and hypocritical. While Comer has relentlessly attacked Biden for the $200,000 loan to his brother, he conveniently ignores his own involvement in similar transactions. It is clear that Comer’s actions do not align with the standards he seeks to impose on others.
Unsurprisingly, Democrats were quick to highlight Comer’s hypocrisy and call for his own investigation. Congressman Jared Moskowitz humorously recreated Comer’s video of signing subpoenas, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Congressman Eric Swalwell went a step further, urging Comer to subpoena himself and referring to the loan as “highly suspicious.” The exposure of Comer’s double standards has brought into question his credibility and integrity as a lawmaker.
It is essential to note that the Republican-led investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings has been ongoing for over 10 months. Despite their efforts, they have failed at every turn to produce any concrete evidence directly implicating Joe Biden in any wrongdoing. News organizations, including CNN,
The Wall Street Journal, FactCheck.org, and the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner, have debunked the allegations made by Republicans.In response to the subpoenas issued by James Comer and other House Republicans, the White House accused them of abusing their power to conduct a partisan smear campaign.
They emphasized that extreme House Republicans should focus on their responsibilities instead of pursuing baseless attacks on the president and his family. This response highlights the frustration felt by the Biden administration over the relentless and unfounded scrutiny they have faced.The exposure of James Comer’s hypocrisy regarding the $200,000 loan to his brother has cast doubt on the legitimacy of his accusations against Joe Biden. Comer’s involvement in similar financial transactions and questionable business practices undermines his credibility as a lawmaker. The stark double standards exhibited by Comer reveal a disconcerting lack of integrity. It is imperative that politicians be held accountable for their actions, and Comer’s actions warrant further scrutiny.
The 2024 election will be here before you know it. Unfortunately, Donald Trump will most likely be the republican nominee for president.There are so many reasons not to vote for Donald Trump and here are 25 reasons NOT to vote for the disgraced former president.
1)Trump was found liable for battery and defamation by a federal jury in New York for raping writer E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. The former disgraced president had claimed that” he never met her” and “she’s not my type.” During his deposition, Carroll’s lawyer asked Trump to identify the people in a photo. Trump pointed to Carroll and confused her with his second wife Marla Maples. At the time the rape occurred Carol was 100% “his type.”He was ordered to pay Carroll $5 million in damages but will owe more since the day after the jury found him liable he went on C.N.N. and defamed her all over again.
2)Donald Trump has already been found guilty of fraud in a civil case in New York brought by Attorney General Letitia James. Trump would inflate his assets to get higher terms on loans based on his property value. Trump, for example, told banks his apartment in Trump Tower was 30,000 square feet. The reality is his apartment is only 10,996 square feet. Then the tax cheat would deflate the value of his property to avoid paying higher taxes. A.G. James’s is suing for 250 million dollars but what really has Trump upset is he is not on Forbes 100 richest people in America anymore.
3)Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, for conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election, interrupt Congress and deprive Americans of their right to vote. Trump spread the big lie to make his supporters think the 2020 election was stolen. He summoned a crowd to the Ellipse and fired them up and told them to march to the Capital or they wouldn’t have a country. Five people died because of January 6 and 138 were injured, many severely.Trump pleaded not guilty and faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted.
4)Trump was charged by a federal grand jury in Florida for mishandling classified documents from his White House and obstructing the investigation into them. He allegedly shared a classified map with visitors and stored boxes of records in his Mar-a-Lago estate, including in a ballroom, bathroom, and shower.He could have completely avoided the indictment if he had just given back the documents when the National Archives asked for them back. You must wonder what the motive was for him not to give them back? Last week a billionaire, who belonged to the Mar-a-Lago club Trump owns, stated publicly that Trump shared our nuclear submarines capabilities with him.Trump can not be trusted with American Secrets let alone the nuclear codes.
5)Trump was indicted by a grand jury in Georgia for interfering with the 2020 election results in the state. He allegedly tried to pressure state officials to overturn Biden’s victory and used fake GOP electors to challenge the certification of the electoral votes. Four out of 19 of his co-defendants, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Scott Hall, and Kenneth Chesebro, have already pleaded guilty and will have to testify in the co-defendants trial.
6)On Trumps failing social media platform, Truth Social, Trump sends thinly vailed threats to witnesses that might testify against him in his criminal cases. Trump knows his base is capable of violence and his hope is that a Trump supporter will carry out acts of violence to those who dare go against him. He posts people’s information online to intimidate witnesses from testifying. People opposed to Trump receive death threats and need around the clock security.
7)Trump has promised to ban the use of federal money to label domestic speech as “misinformation” or “disinformation”. This proposal raises concerns about freedom of speech and the ability to question the veracity of Trump’s statements.This way he can not be held accountable for the misinformation he spreads. I guarantee that if elected he would limit democrats’ speech against him.
8)The Silencing Science Tracker recorded numerous anti-science actions taken by the federal government under Trump, including censorship and hindrance of research. While the Biden administration has begun to reverse some of these changes, public distrust of science remains a challenge. Trump also intends to cut federal funding for universities engaged in “censorship activities,” further raising concerns about academic freedom.
9)Trump recently stated that he beat President Obama in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. He also suggested that President Biden would lead the country into World War 2, incorrectly referencing historical events.
10)Trump has made bizarre remarks, such as the claim that people need identification to buy bread or that women are having abortions after birth.These statements have been criticized for their lack of factual basis and their potential to spread misinformation. It calls into question his cognitive skills.
11) Another contentious aspect of Trump’s presidency was his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their families. Although efforts have been made to reunite families, there are still children who remain separated today. This policy drew widespread condemnation for its impact on vulnerable children and families seeking asylum.
12) Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has also been a subject of scrutiny. He infamously suggested that ingesting bleach could cure COVID-19, a statement that was widely debunked and criticized. Moreover, his administration’s response to the pandemic has been criticized for its lack of coordination and effective measures, resulting in a high number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States.
13) It is a known fact that Donald Trump told over 30,000 lies during his four years as president. There isn’t a lie too big or too small for him to tell. One of the funniest lies he told is that he weighs 215 pounds and that he is 6’3” when he most likely weighs 240 and is only 6’2”.
14) Trump will make sure that woman do not have the right to choose what happens to their body. He has praised himself for appointing Supreme Court Justices that overturned Roe v. Wade.
15) Trump is nothing but a bully. He will throw anyone under the bus who are of no use to him anymore.
16) Donald Trump aided and comforted the people who tried to overthrow the government. He waited hours to call the mob off and once he did call off the mob, he told them that they were “very special.” He even went as far as recording a song with the January 6 inmates that he plays at his rallies.
17) Donald Trump has shown a fondness for dictators, as evidenced by his expressed admiration for leaders like Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, and Xi Jinping. Despite Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Trump claimed to have a good relationship with Putin. He also praised Xi Jinping’s intelligence and China’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, overlooking the negative consequences of his trade deal with China. Trump even refused to condemn Kim Jong Ung’s human rights abuses, describing his relationship with the North Korean leader as a “love affair”. This pattern of admiration for dictators raises concerns about Trump’s stance on human rights and his approach to international relations.
18) Trump plans to fire federal officials who have he believes have been involved in disinformation efforts, means anything that Trump doesn’t agree with is misinformation.He has stated that he wants to be able to fire civil servants who do not agree with his agenda.
19) Trump has never shied away from making bold and controversial statements, and his recent speech was no exception. Two weeks ago, he made the audacious claim that he not only defeated President Obama in the 2016 election but also in the 2020 election. This statement, however, is factually incorrect, as President Obama served two terms and was not a candidate in the 2016 or 2020 elections. Trump’s assertion seems to be a misrepresentation of the truth, perhaps driven by his desire to maintain a sense of victory and relevance. Furthermore, in his speech, Trump went on to suggest that President Biden’s policies would lead the United States into World War 2. This statement is not only misleading but historically inaccurate. World War 2 took place between 1939 and 1945, decades before any of the mentioned presidents were in office.
20) Trump made an incorrect reference to Jeb Bush being the one who initiated U.S. involvement in the Middle East, rather than his brother, George W. Bush. While Jeb Bush may have had a role in his brother’s administration, it was indeed President George W. Bush who ordered military action in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It is crucial to rely on accurate information, especially when discussing significant events and the actions of political leaders.
21) If Donald Trump were to be elected again, democracy as we know it will be over. There might not be another election because he will make himself president for life. There will no longer be a peaceful transfer of power. Every election he doesn’t win will be deemed rigged or stolen.
22) The Trump Administration’s failure to respond effectively to the COVID-19 pandemic has been marked by a series of missteps and inadequate measures. Despite being warned about the potential severity of the outbreak, the
administration downplayed the threat and failed to take aggressive action. Instead of prioritizing public health, the administration focused on controlling the message and prioritizing economic and political considerations.
This lack of preparedness and delayed response has been attributed to internal divisions, a lack of planning, and the president’s own instincts. As a result, the US has suffered a significant number of preventable COVID-19 deaths.
The administration’s response to the pandemic has been widely criticized for its failure to protect the American people. He couldn’t even encourage the use of masks because he didn’t wat to wear one because it made his orange make-up come off.
23) Trump’s remarks about ingesting disinfectants to cure Covid 19.The suggestion became symbolic of the chaotic handling of the pandemic by the Trump administration.
24) In recent times, there has been a concerning rise in divisive rhetoric by Trump surrounding the issue of migration.
One particularly alarming statement that has gained attention is the claim that all migrants are rapists, thugs, or murderers. Such a sweeping generalization is not only inaccurate but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes and fuels fear and prejudice. It is essential to recognize the individuality and diversity within any group, including migrants. To paint an entire community with such a broad brush is both unfair and unjust. It is crucial to approach the topic of migration with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to promoting inclusivity and respect for all individuals.
25) The former President has collaborated with a group of inmates involved in the January 6 riot at the Capitol to release a song called “Justice for All.” The track features Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, while the inmates sing “The Star-Spangled Banner.”
These are only 25 reasons why the twice impeached, four time indicted, sexually abusive fraudstersshould not be president. I am sure there are plenty more.
It’s heartbreaking that the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas is entering its second month, with no sign of a lasting ceasefire. The war has killed more than 5,000 people, displaced more than 1 million, and caused widespread damage to infrastructure and livelihoods in Gaza and Israel.
The conflict erupted on October 12, when Hamas militants crossed into Israel through a tunnel network and launched a surprise attack on several military and civilian targets, killing more than 1,300 Israelis and taking hostages. Israel responded by launching a massive aerial and ground offensive against Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip, killing more than 3,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians.
The attack by Hamas was seen as an attempt to break the 14-year blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt on Gaza, which has severely restricted the movement of goods and people in and out of the coastal enclave. Hamas also said it was retaliating for Israeli actions in Jerusalem, where tensions had been rising over the planned evictions of Palestinian families from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah, a neighborhood claimed by Jewish settlers
Despite several attempts by regional and international mediators to broker a ceasefire, the fighting has continued unabated, with both sides exchanging fire and escalating their attacks. Israel has expanded its targets to include high-rise buildings, media offices, hospitals, schools, and tunnels used by Hamas. Hamas has increased its rocket fire towards Israeli cities, reaching as far as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza has deteriorated dramatically, with shortages of food, water, electricity, and medical supplies. The UN estimates that more than half of the population of Gaza needs humanitarian assistance. Many people have fled their homes and sought shelter in UN-run schools or other public buildings. The UN has warned that Gaza is on the brink of a “catastrophic situation” and called for an immediate end to the hostilities.
Israel has also faced internal unrest, with violent clashes between Jewish and Arab citizens in several mixed towns. The violence has been fueled by incitement from extremist groups on both sides, as well as by social media posts spreading misinformation and hate speech. The Israeli police have arrested hundreds of people for rioting, arson, assault, and vandalism.
The prospects for peace are dim, as both sides seem determined to continue fighting until they achieve their goals. Israel says it wants to degrade Hamas’s military capabilities and restore deterrence, while Hamas says it wants to end the blockade on Gaza and secure the rights of Palestinians in Jerusalem.
The international community has expressed concern over the escalating violence and urged both sides to respect international humanitarian law and protect civilians. The U.S., Israel’s main ally, has said it supports Israel’s right to self-defense but also called for a de-escalation of tensions. The U.S. has also announced a $100 million aid package for Gaza, which will be delivered through Egypt.
Egypt, which shares a border with Gaza and has close ties with both Israel and Hamas, has been leading the efforts to mediate a ceasefire. Egypt has also opened its Rafah crossing to allow humanitarian aid and wounded people to enter or leave Gaza. However, Egypt’s role has been complicated by its strained relations with Turkey and Qatar, which are allies of Hamas and have been vocal critics of Israel.
Other regional actors, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates, have also been involved in trying to end the conflict or aid the affected populations. Iran has warned Israel to stop its attacks on Gaza or face consequences in the region. Saudi Arabia has condemned Israel’s actions in Jerusalem and Gaza and called for a comprehensive solution to the Palestinian issue. Jordan has sent medical teams and supplies to Gaza and hosted Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for talks. The UAE has sent an aid plane to Gaza and expressed support for a two-state solution.
The UN Security Council has held several meetings on the crisis but has failed to issue a joint statement or resolution due to disagreements among its members. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has repeatedly called for an immediate ceasefire and a revival of the peace process based on a two-state solution.
Israel does not want a ceasefire because they believe that will give Hamas time to rest and recharge.
It is sad to see all the civilians from Israel and Palestine caught in the middle of this conflict that are being killed, kidnapped, or displaced. There are so many innocent lives being completely ruined by no fault of their own.The sad truth is children make up half the citizens in Gaza who have been killed or displaced. You have to wonder what’s the point of all this bloodshed. Let’s hope for peace in the middle east sooner rather than later.
Welcome and welcome back to Northern Essex Community College! As we begin the fall 2023 semester, we are excited to welcome both new and returning students to our campus. This semester promises to be an exciting one, filled with new opportunities and challenges.
As you begin your studies, we encourage you to take advantage of all the resources that NECC has to offer.
Our faculty and staff are here to support you every step of the way, whether you need help with your coursework or guidance on your career path. NECC also offers a wide range of extracurricular activities, clubs, and organizations that can help you get involved on campus and meet new people. NECC has plenty of student groups to enrich our community.
The Art Club, the Sexuality Alliance, and Environment Club are among some of the student favorites. There is also the Dungeon and Dragons Club, Nursing Club, and Environmental Club to name a few.
The Student Government Association is a great way to get involved with NECC and make a difference here at the school. You would be representing students’ interests and concerns and serve as a voice for the NECC community.
If athletics is more your thing this fall you check out women’s volleyball, men’s soccer, men’s and women’s cross country and men’s and women’s basketball. Tighten up your laces or drop by to catch a game. NECC sports will keep you rooting for the home team.
Whether you are interested in pursuing a degree in business, health care, or liberal arts, NECC has something for everyone.
Classes are designed to be engaging and challenging and the staff is here to help you succeed. Your success is their success.
As we begin this new semester together, we want you to know that we are here for you every step of the way.
We wish you all the best as you embark on this exciting new journey at Northern Essex Community College!
The possibility of a government shutdown is looming as the deadline to pass a funding bill is approaching. The deadline to pass a funding bill is Sept. 30, giving Congress just a week to agree on a path forward.
Both Democrats and Republicans have said they’ll try to advance a short-term funding bill, known as a continuing resolution, to keep the government open while lawmakers keep deliberating on full-year appropriations. However, Freedom caucus
Republicans are threatening to make a shut down a real possibility by opposing a funding bill if their demands are not met.
If the government were to shut down, hundreds of thousands of non-postal employees will be furloughed or forced to work without pay.
This could lead to significant economic hardships for workers and their families. In addition, many government programs are suspended or curtailed during the shutdown. It can also have broader economic consequences causing a loss in consumer confidence and slowing economic growth.
If the federal government were to shut down Social Security and Medicare benefits would be sent but benefit verification as well as card issuance would halt. National Parks would not be funded and would have to turn away millions of visitors at more than 400 parks and would lose more than $500 million in lost visitor spending. Air travel could be impacted if air traffic controllers must work without pay. This could cause an increase in travel time if TSA agents do not report to work. Airports could temporarily close.
The National Institute of Health could be prevented from admitting new patients or processing grant applications. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families could have to front the money for formula grant programs. The funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) program is mandatory but the ability to send out “food stamp” benefits could be affected for millions of low-income families.
Furloughed employees are not allowed to work and do not receive pay checks but are guaranteed back pay once the government reopens.
The group of lawmakers putting funding in doubt is largely the same as those who previously said they’d reject a debt ceiling deal unless it met every one of their demands.
The Freedom Caucus is one of the key blocs with a hardline position on funding.
Members of the Freedom Caucus include Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida and Congresswoman Lauren Boebert of Colorado. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia has recently been kicked out of the caucus.
They are demanding spending levels below the top-line numbers that Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy had agreed to with President Joe Biden as part of a bill to increase the nation’s debt ceiling.
They do not think McCarthy went far enough to cut federal spending.
They want inclusion of a bill that aims to build more wall at the southern border and restrict asylum for those seeking to remain in the U.S. for fear of persecution or harm.
The Freedom Caucus would like their supporters to believe that the borders are wide open under President Biden. The Biden Administration has already put additional resources at the southern border region to scale up its anti-smuggling operations and expanded coordination and support for border cities and non-governmental organization. Biden also has new enforcement measures to increase security at the border and reduce the number of people crossing unlawfully between ports of entry.
The Freedom Caucus wants to defund Special Council Jack Smith’s office accusing Smith of “weaponizing” the government, election interference, and political prosecution for the indictment of former president Donald J. Trump.
The Freedom Caucus would also like to cut the amount of aid the U.S. is providing to Ukraine in order to help them to defend their country from an unprovoked invasion by Vladimir Putin’s Russian Army.
For now, Republican appetite for a shutdown is mixed since the party has historically been blamed when its members have caused them in 2019 and 2013. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy could try to build a coalition of House Republicans and Democrats to get numbers he needs to pass the bill without conservatives, though attempting to do so would most likely cost him future support.
If McCarthy fails to get enough votes from his caucus, he could lose his speakership. The Speaker of the House is elected by members of the House of Representatives at the beginning of each new Congress. If McCarthy loses his speakership, it would be because he failed to follow through with his promises to certain congressman/women he made to become speaker. This could have significant implications for Republican leadership in Congress going forward.
Congressman Jim McGovern is a member of the Democratic Party and represents the Second District of Massachusetts in the U.S. House of Representatives. He is a strong advocate for human rights, peace, and ending hunger. He has served on several committees, including the Committee on Rules, the Committee on Agriculture, and the Committee on Budget. He is also the chairman of the House rules committee. McGovern helped make lunch free for all students in Massachusetts among many other accomplishments. I had the pleasure of sitting down with the Congressman to discuss some of the issues going on in Washington.
Q: One of your mentors, Congressman Joe Moakley, once said about Congress, “get to know everyone as a person, get to know what they stand for, and who they are and treat them with respect” with today’s MAGA Republicans do you find it hard to follow that advice?
A: I do. Joe Moakley, he has a great mentor to me, he thought politics was an honorable profession, and he thought the ability to get things done was about building relationships. I still try and follow his advice, I have friends that are very conservative republicans, I try to get to know them on a personal basis, try to get to know them so we have something in common. Because not everything is a big partisan fight. Before Joe Moakley I worked for a guy named George McGovern, who ran for president, no relation. He had the same philosophy too, he friended republicans like Barry Goldwater, he used to say to me, “you don’t have to agree on everything, but agree on something.” So the Moakley and Mcgovern influences are still very strong on me, and
I try to build as many relationships as I can, and it’s hard. There are some people who don’t want to reciprocate. The elevator will stop, they’ll see me and not want to get into the elevator with me. I will put them in their place on the house floor, because it can be very combative. Those are instances when and where I am fighting for things I believe in and feel very strongly about.
A lot of the MAGA republicans view me as more than just an advisory, but as an enemy. I find that unfortunate, and as a result some relationships cannot be forged.
Q: Former President Donald Trump was just indicted again for the 3rd time, federally in Washington DC for inciting January 6th, he has been indicted already federally in Florida for being in possession of classified documents and in New York for the hush money payments made to Stormy Daniels and here there might be a fourth indictment any minute. If convicted on any of those charges, do you think he should or will spend time in prison?
A: That’ll be up to who’s prosecuting the case and a judge and a jury. I don’t think that Donald Trump is fit to serve in any office. I think he’s moved this country away from democracy and more toward authoritarianism and fascism quite frankly, and I think he is a very dangerous man. I think one of the things he has done, that is particularly offensive to me, is that he is a pathological liar that has deceived people. He has driven wedges through our society that have been very destructive and spread so much misinformation. I was the last person on the House Floor on January 6th, I saw the destruction that he brought to bear on the Capital. Many House Police officers were injured. The lies and the deception, this is a man that this country needs to move beyond from. He should be treated like any other citizen in this country; if a jury of his peers finds him guilty, he should receive the same punishment anyone else would.
Q: Do you find his base to be involved in a cult?
A: He has somewhat of a cult like following, let me put it that way. Because a lot of people will corner me at airports, restaurants, or town halls and want to defend him, without hearing anything the other side has to say. He is always right, nothing he says is ever wrong. At least listen to my opinion if you want me to listen to yours. I have my set of beliefs, but I’ll still listen to people I don’t agree with. We have to listen to one another, that’s a sign of respect. If we stop listening to one another, or we just disagree then you must be all bad. That’s not good for our democracy.
Q: What do you think Donald Trump’s hold on members of both Houses of Congress is?
A: He is very popular amongst the republican base. I serve with republicans who tell me every day that he’s dangerous, he’s out of his mind. They think he is out of his mind, but they don’t want to say anything bad about him because they don’t want to get primaried. Amongst republican primary voters Trump’s popularity is at an all-time high. I get it, I understand why republicans are nervous about taking him on, but at some point you have to ask yourself “why am I in Congress?” It’s not just to get reelected, you’re in Congress to do things, to move this country in a better direction. Going along to get along with someone you tell me in private is awful, tells me you don’t belong in Congress, you should have the courage of your convictions. I am old enough to remember when Richard Nixon was president, and conservative republicans like Barry Goldwater went to Nixon and told him “You’re done, we are not going to support you anymore because of what you did”, and Nixon was out. We don’t have any Barry Goldwaters in today’s republican party in Congress right now.
I was there on January 6th, I saw the chaos and destruction he brought to this nation. His supporters will say over and over again that the election was stolen from him, and I say on the contrary, there were dozens and dozens and dozens of court cases that he lost challenging the election results. This man tried to deliberately undercut a democratic election and tried to take away the power of the people’s votes. He tried to do anything to achieve his goal, at a certain point whether you support him or not, his behavior has to be unacceptable. I’ve lived long enough to see elections I rejoiced over and others that made me very depressed. That’s the way it works, that’s our system, that’s our democratic system. In Trump world elections don’t matter, people don’t matter, all that matters is that he holds onto power. That’s not a democracy, that’s an authoritarianism regime, that’s a fascist regime. I don’t want any part of that, I don’t want us moving in that direction. I look at Trump as an extremely dangerous human being, he uses people, usually for his own financial gain.
Q: There is an age old saying that all politicians lie, do you think there should be laws against politicians lying or using deceit to win their elections?
A: I wish there was a way to do that, to control purposeful lying and misinformation in campaigns. The right to freedom of speech is a very powerful right. When you take that and turn it into something that results in violence, that’s a different story. I think that when campaigning both republicans and democrats alike should be held to a high standard, to the facts, you know there are facts. This is a cup of coffee, it’s not a dining room table. You know we have people in Trump world who will say no it’s a dining room table, and 30% of the voters agreeing saying it’s a dining room table and not a cup of coffee. This is crazy! But I don’t know how we establish a form or a way where we call people out on their blatant lies on the left and the right. The lies and the manipulation, we have seen this in our world history before, we have seen demagogs rise to power through deceit and manipulation, inciting fear and moving people into panic, and each time that happened the outcome was not good. We are approaching another election; I am hoping the American people will say no to fascism.
You can win the popular vote and still lose the election, Hillary Clinton won by 4 million votes and was never president of this country. It matters where the votes are coming from in the electoral college, I personally would love to get rid of the electoral college. None the less it is still part of our system.
Q: MAGA Republicans are spending a lot of taxpayer’s money on investigating Hunter Biden and hoping to find some criminality by President Biden. So far, they have provided no evidence that connects President Biden to any wrongdoing. Where do you think this insanity ends?
A: They are looking for a distraction, let me say this, Hunter Biden has done some bad things in his life. He ought to be treated like anyone else in this country, he is currently in the process of getting a plea deal, trying to bring his criminal cases to closure.
If other things were to come up that he did wrong, that’s illegal, he should be treated like anyone else and deal with the punishment like anyone else. I think a lot of this stuff with Hunter Biden is to distract from Donald Trump. If something else were to come out, I am not going to circle the wagons around Hunter Biden, if it’s illegal, he should face the same legal process as anyone else. They tried this same thing with Hillary Clinton, they caused a percent of the American people to have a strong amount of distrust in her. I thought it was terribly unfair, and denied someone who I think would have been a spectacular president. They’ll keep on doing this, the whole thing with Hunter Biden is to keep the suspicion or wrongdoing alive. They don’t want any of it resolved, they just want it out there. It’s like if an investigation were to show he did something illegal, he should be punished in accordance to the law, period. I would never object to that. If there is nothing there, then there is nothing there. It’s not up to politicians to make that determination, there are investigators and prosecutors whose job it is to make that determination. Not Congress.
Q: Donald Trump is currently the frontrunner for the Republican Presidential Primary, with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis coming a distant second, who with their policies, is a bigger threat to the country?
A: I think they are both awful. I think a Trump victory is the end of our democracy. I think it’s sad that they are the frontrunners for the republican party. I am from Massachusetts. I served with Governor Charlie Baker. I respected him. We had our disagreements, but I thought he was a man of integrity. Where are the Charlie Bakers in today’s Republican party or the Mitt Romneys or John McCains? Instead, we are stuck with pathological liars like Donald Trump. It’s like really? And I am shocked that more Republicans aren’t asking for a much higher quality candidate. It’s not like there aren’t any good Republicans. Liz Cheney for example, got primaried for telling the truth. She and I agree on 10% of the issues, but she is my friend and I have respect for her. I have even more respect for her because she stood up to a bully named Donald Trump. It’s not easy for people to tell the truth, especially when they are up against the slime machine that is the Donald Trump operation. Cheney and Kinzinger told the truth, they get death threats every day, they need to security for themselves and their families. They sacrificed a lot for telling the truth, and history will judge them in a way that is very positive. Whatever the short-term advantages are to rally around the lies of Donald Trump are just that, short term. Long term history will praise those that had the guts to tell the truth and will condemn those that went along with the lies.
Q: I know something you are very passionate about is peace. Are you concerned with Donald Trump saying publicly if convicted the country will see things that have never been done before? Similar to January 6th or worse?
A: He incited January 6.th It was a terrible terrible day, like I said I was the last person on the House Floor. I took over for Nancy Pelosi as acting Speaker of the House. I came face to face with this angry mob that was destroying property and beating up Capital Police Officers. I don’t believe in violence, and those that promote violence, we ought to condemn them. Anybody that incites violence should be held accountable and put in jail. One of the hallmarks of a democracy is that you resolve your differences at the ballot box, you don’t take up arms if you don’t like the result of an election. You move on to another day. I was in the Speaker’s chair and saw every member of the House and some of the Republicans that now are trying to pass off January 6th as something that was no big deal. One in particular, who was cowering behind Capital Police. I thought he was going to cry.
I don’t blame him for being nervous, it was a scary day, but for him to come out now like it was no big deal, that’s just offensive.
Those officers made sure we all got out, and that none of us were injured or killed. When you say nothing happened that day, that it was no big deal, it’s just an insult to those officers and to our democracy. I don’t know how anyone can defend what happened that day, just because you don’t like what happened doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, it happened. There were millions and millions of dollars in damage. One officer lost his eye site, some others were severely injured, some resulting in their deaths. Somehow that can be said to be “no big deal” I think that’s offensive, and that Donald Trump allowed this to happen, urged this to happen, I think it’s unforgivable. I am particularly frustrated with these republican congress members that are macho and urged it on before the attack. I wish I could have videotaped it; they were cowering in the corners petrified for their lives. Keving McCarthy that day, said the right thing, telling Donald Trump that he needed to get these people to back off. Then,
I don’t know what happened, but a few days later McCarthy was back in the mode of defending Donald Trump. I don’t know what Trump threatened him with, but in a matter of days, he did a complete reversal.
Q: Abortion will be a big driver in the 2024 elections for people to come out and vote. We know MAGA republicans want to force women to have babies no matter what their situation is. Women have abortions for many different reasons, one of which is that they cannot afford the cost of having children. I know preventing childhood hunger is something you’re passionate about, do you find it troubling that those same republicans want to cut programs like SNAP and WIC?
A: Barney Frank had a line I think rings true, that republicans believe life begins at conception and ends at birth. I am beginning to think Barney was right. In terms of the issue of abortion, that is something that should not be decided by politicians. Everybody’s life is different, everybody has different circumstances and challenges. That is up to a woman to make that decision, it is not up to Congress. Some of my colleagues who believe a woman’s right to abortion should be restricted, they themselves have had mistresses that they paid to have abortions. It’s like you can’t make this stuff up, so I believe very strongly in a woman’s right to choose. That we should protect reproductive freedoms. I also believe that we have a moral right that no one in this country, or in this world goes hungry. I think it’s a fundamental human right and the fact that we live in the richest country in the world and have over 35 million citizens that don’t know where their next meal is going to come from should be a source of great shame for every politician and person of great means in this country. There is not a single congressional district in this country that is hunger free. We have hungry kids, we have hungry workers, and we have hungry senior citizens. We have millions of people who do not have access to nutritious foods, and we can fix that. If you’re not moved morally to make sure everybody has food security, and if all you care about is the bottom line, you should want to join us in this effort. Hunger is costing us, kids that go to school hungry don’t learn, senior citizens that take their medication on an empty stomach who should take it with a meal end up in the emergency room. Workers that are hungry are less productive in the workforce. So, there is a cost to this that far out ways any investments we need to address hunger in this country. We ought to end hunger now! I worked very hard with the Massachusetts legislature to make sure that all school kids will now get their lunches for free now. Kids in Massachusetts that can’t afford a lunch don’t learn, and now that ends.
Q: Protecting human rights is something you strongly advocate. There’s an attack right now on transgender people, especially transgender children. There is a lot of misinformation from the right stating children are being mutilated, when a strong majority of gender affirming operations are not happening until after 18 year old, and approximately only 1% of people (including children) that have transitioned regret it. Do you think it’s possible to educate people on the right of the facts on the harm they are causing by attacking gender affirming care of transgender people?
A: We have to try. The misinformation those on the right are spreading also impacts how people in the middle may think. My late father used to tell me all the time, “everybody is different, everybody is unique, and we need to respect each other for who we are.” That’s that, it’s that simple, he was right. I don’t understand why there are so many people in this country who spend all their time trying to attack and rip apart people who are different from them. They highlight differences about those in our community, it is such a waste of time and energy, and it’s destructive. We have seen hate crimes increase, suicides increase, why don’t we just respect each other for who we are and get on with our lives.
Q: Gun violence is the number one cause of death of children right now in the United States. MAGA republicans say they are the party of saving the children. Why do you think they are so against common sense gun laws?
A: Because the gun lobby provides them with a lot of money for their campaigns and they are afraid that they will lose their primaries if they do anything that the gun lobby does not want them to do. We live in a country where we have massacres occur on a regular basis. No other industrialized nation in the world has a gun violence problem like we do. What’s wrong with background checks? If you have a criminal background or a background of violence, we don’t want you to have a gun. What’s wrong with limiting the sale of guns to people that have violent histories? Do you really need a weapon of war to be able to hunt? Some of these weapons that people demand access to were designed for combat. This is out of control, It’s ridiculous and
I am getting tired of moments of silence. We need more moments of outrage, thoughts and prayers are not working, they are not stopping this. When Bill Clinton was president, we had the ban on assault weapons that actually made a difference. And when Bush became president, they let it expire. Since then, we have seen a proliferation of not just gun deaths, but of massacres in schools, synagogues, churches, workplaces, at some point we all have to say collectively “this is not how we want to live.” Common sense ought to prevail.
Q: The 2024 election is going to be one of the most important this country has ever had; how can we get more people involved in getting out the vote?
A: I think we must remind people of what is at stake. We need to tell people what we are for, not just what we are against. I do think Joe Biden has a vision of positive government. I think he has already done things that are making a difference, we just passed the biggest infrastructure bill in history. It will help in fixing our roads and infrastructure all around the country, that’s a big deal. It will help create new jobs; it will help take on the war against climate change. Biden is trying to take on prescription drug prices and trying to make college affordable for young people. He is trying to make a country where everyone is respected for who they are. He is also trying to take on this epidemic of gun violence. People have to pay attention, and they need to understand what is at stake. Because if Donald Trump were to win this election it is not only the end of democracy, but it will usher in authoritarianism and quite frankly fascism. I say that as a student of history. That is what Donald Trump is, he is a fascist. Countries that have moved into authoritarianism and fascism realize it too late, and you cannot reverse it. We need to realize right now that the country that we love is under attack from within and this election is the most important election of our lifetime!
As the fall semester begins, it is important to remember that politics affects us all. From the cost of tuition to the availability of healthcare, or the right to choose what happens to a woman’s body. The decisions made by our elected officials have a direct impact on our lives. That’s why it’s so important to pay attention to politics and make your voice heard by voting.
As Editor in Chief, I am committed to keeping readers informed about the issues that matter most. In the coming issues, I will be covering national politics in greater depth, with a focus on helping students make informed decisions before they vote. Often voters who are not informed tend to vote against their own self interests without even realizing it.
People who are not informed vote for a candidate just because there is an R or D next to their name on the without knowing their policies. Everything is a culture war on the right. Republicans are not offering any new policies other than wanting to ban drag shows, books, or a woman’s right to choose. If you listen to right wing media, you will think Democrats are trying to take away your gas stove, Democrats are telling you that you can’t eat hamburgers, or Democrats are pro-pedophile. Republicans in Congress are not serious people on the issues that matter to the American public.
A big issue that is very popular with Americans is the assault on a woman’s right to choose.
Republicans in states like Alabama want to prosecute woman who leave the state or help a woman leave the state to receive an abortion and charge them with conspiracy.
Under this law if passed a woman does not even have to go through with the abortion. If she discussed with another person a plan to bring her out of state to receive an abortion she and her confidante can still be charged with conspiracy.
In Idaho legislation has been passed to prosecute anyone who drives a minor out of state to receive an abortion or helps a minor access a medication induced abortion in another state is punishable by two to five years in prison.
In Texas Republicans have passed a law that would make it illegal to transport anyone to get an abortion on roads within a city or county limits. The law allows any private citizens to sue a person or organization they suspect of violating the ordinance. The provisions have already been passed in two counties and two cities. Texas also passed a law that would make it a felony punishable by up to life in prison for a doctor who performs an abortion. They consider life to be from the moment of fertilization. The statute also says the attorney general “shall” seek a civil penalty of not less than $100,000, plus attorney’s fees.
Many states are also trying to implement six week abortion bans. Most woman do not even know they are pregnant after six weeks.
Republicans are also the party that wants to cut the WIC program which supplies low income woman with infants and children with healthy foods they need to grow. If Republicans have their way they want to force a woman to have a baby but want to do nothing to help that baby thrive.
I believe that every student has the power to make a difference, and that starts with exercising your right to vote. Whether you are passionate about climate change, social justice, economic inequality, or a woman’s right to control what happens with her own body, your vote can help shape the future of our country.
As we begin this new semester, I encourage you to stay informed and engaged. Read our newspaper, and most importantly, make sure you are registered to vote. Together, we can make a difference and build a brighter future for all.
The spring college semester is always an exciting time of year, and nowhere is that more evident than at Northern Essex Community College (NECC). As the days grow longer and warmer, students and faculty alike are filled with a sense of anticipation as they prepare to wrap up the academic year and embark on new adventures.
For many students, the end of the spring semester means the end of their academic journey at NECC. As they finish up their final classes and take their last exams, they are filled with a mix of emotions – excitement for the future, sadness at leaving behind friends and mentors, and pride in their accomplishments.
As the final weeks of the semester wind down, NECC is abuzz with activity. The library is filled with students cramming for exams and finishing up last-minute assignments. The student center is alive with chatter as friends gather to commiserate about the stress of finals week. And the classrooms are full with lively discussions as professors wrap up their lectures and prepare their students for their final exams.
One of the highlights of the end of the semester at NECC is the graduation ceremony on May 13. For many students, this is the culmination of years of hard work and dedication, and it’s a day they will never forget. As they don their caps and gowns and march across the stage to receive their diplomas, they are filled with a sense of accomplishment and pride. Family members and friends cheer them on from the audience, and the air is filled with a sense of celebration and joy.
But the end of the semester isn’t just about saying goodbye, it’s also about looking ahead to the future. For those students who will be returning to NECC in the fall, the end of the semester is a chance to reflect on their successes and challenges over the past year, and to set goals for the future. Whether they are planning to transfer to a four-year college, pursuing a new career path, or simply continuing their studies at NECC, they are filled with a sense of optimism and excitement for what lies ahead.
For the faculty and staff at NECC, the end of the semester is a chance to take a breath and reflect on the hard work they have put in over the past year. They have dedicated themselves to helping their students succeed, and the end of the semester is a chance to see the fruits of their labor. As they wrap up their classes and prepare for the summer break, they are filled with a sense of pride in their students and in their own accomplishments.
Of course, the end of the semester isn’t all sunshine and roses. It can be a stressful time for everyone involved, from students cramming for exams to professors grading piles of papers. But even amidst the stress and chaos, there is a sense of camaraderie and support that pervades NECC.
Students help each other study, professors offer extra office hours to answer questions, and staff members go above and beyond to make sure everything runs smoothly. It’s a time when everyone comes together to support each other and help each other succeed.
As the spring college semester comes to an end at NECC, it’s a time of mixed emotions – excitement, sadness, pride, and anticipation. But more than anything, it’s a time of celebration and accomplishment. Whether they are graduating, returning in the fall, or embarking on a new journey altogether, everyone at NECC can look back on the past year with a sense of pride and satisfaction. And as they look ahead to the future, they are filled with a sense of optimism and excitement for what lies ahead.